GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 78% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 2394 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
240−250
medium / 768p
180−190
210−220
ultra / 1080p
100−110
130−140
QHD / 1440p
60−65
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−35
60−65
high / 768p
150−160
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
30−33
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−33
QHD / 1440p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
40−45
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−11
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
21−24
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
GK106
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
15 November 2018
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
