GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon R9 M390X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R9 M390X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against Radeon R9 M390X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon R9 M390X
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 34% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 M390X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 257 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R9 M390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
210−220
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
60−65
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−35
55−60
high / 768p
150−160
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
20−22
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon R9 M390X
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3
Code name
GK106
Amethyst (XT) / Tonga
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
9 June 2015
Pipelines
768
2048
Core clock speed
980 MHz
723 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
92.54
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
2,961 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Not Listed
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price
