GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against Radeon RX 460 mobile, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 143% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 5994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−33
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
180−190
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
60−65
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
20−22
20−22
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
80−85
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
768
896
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1180 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
66.08
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
2,115 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
