GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon RX 640
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX 640
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 168% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon RX 640 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 238 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 5994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 142% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
30−33
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
210−220
130−140
medium / 768p
180−190
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
50−55
QHD / 1440p
60−65
27−30
4K / 2160p
30−35
12−14
high / 768p
150−160
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
27−30
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
60−65
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 124% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
90−95
50−55
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
−
medium / 720p
−
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
10−11
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
30−35
10−11
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than Radeon RX 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
30−35
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
60−65
21−24
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon RX 640.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX 640
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
12 August 2019
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1218 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1218 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
38.98
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
