GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
When comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
6−7
10−12
4K / 2160p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
60−65
85−90
4K / 2160p
30−35
45−50
high / 768p
150−160
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
90−95
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
GK106
Vega Raven Ridge
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
7 January 2020
Pipelines
768
512
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1750 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
