GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Tesla C2075
When comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
110 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 124% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti is 354 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 243 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 3127 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
190−200
210−220
medium / 768p
160−170
190−200
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK106
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
9 October 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
928 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
59.2 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,425 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.1 kh/s
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
49 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.26 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
