GeForce GTX 650 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
64 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 17% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650.
GeForce GTX 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650.
GeForce GTX 650 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 is 404 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 2795 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
9−10
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
120−130
120−130
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
27−30
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
30−33
27−30
medium / 768p
20−22
18−20
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK107
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 September 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
384
576
Core clock speed
1058 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.9 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
812.5 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
5.70" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128-bit GDDR5
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.0 GB/s
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.0 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.38" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
26 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price