GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 261 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 2794 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
12−14
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
40−45
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
210−220
120−130
ultra / 1080p
120−130
55−60
QHD / 1440p
100−110
30−35
4K / 2160p
55−60
27−30
high / 768p
170−180
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
110−120
65−70
ultra / 1080p
85−90
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
9−10
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
QHD / 1440p
20−22
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
4−5
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−33
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
130−140
65−70
medium / 1080p
75−80
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Fortnite is 122% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
27−30
medium / 1080p
40−45
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
55−60
medium / 768p
95−100
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−12
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Metro Exodus is 214% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
80−85
27−30
medium / 768p
50−55
18−20
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 171% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 August 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1344
576
Core clock speed
915 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192-bit GDDR5
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
99 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
