GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro M4000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 60 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 5006 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
35−40
4K / 2160p
9−10
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
250−260
medium / 768p
210−220
220−230
ultra / 1080p
120−130
180−190
QHD / 1440p
100−110
110−120
4K / 2160p
55−60
70−75
high / 768p
170−180
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
27−30
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
QHD / 1440p
20−22
27−30
4K / 2160p
9−10
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
80−85
medium / 1080p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
130−140
180−190
medium / 1080p
75−80
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−35
4K / 2160p
14−16
24−27
low / 720p
75−80
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
110−120
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
QHD / 1440p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
10−12
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
80−85
130−140
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK104
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 August 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
1344
1,280
Core clock speed
915 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1013 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
78.00
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
2,496 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192-bit GDDR5
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
99 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
