GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 2394 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
QHD / 1440p
14−16
18−20
4K / 2160p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
240−250
medium / 768p
210−220
210−220
ultra / 1080p
120−130
130−140
QHD / 1440p
100−110
100−110
4K / 2160p
55−60
60−65
high / 768p
170−180
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
85−90
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
20−22
21−24
4K / 2160p
9−10
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
75−80
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
4K / 2160p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
GK104
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 August 2012
15 November 2018
Pipelines
1344
1024
Core clock speed
915 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192-bit GDDR5
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
99 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
