GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Fury will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Radeon R9 Fury
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
275 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 Fury has 83% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 Fury has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 Fury - with GCN 1.2.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 Fury is 494 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
50−55
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
8−9
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
QHD / 1440p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
9−10
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
40−45
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Battlefield 5 is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p
230−240
250−260
medium / 768p
210−220
230−240
ultra / 1080p
120−130
−
QHD / 1440p
100−110
150−160
4K / 2160p
55−60
100−110
high / 768p
170−180
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
27−30
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
60−65
QHD / 1440p
20−22
40−45
4K / 2160p
9−10
21−24
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−33
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Far Cry 5 is 117% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
90−95
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
QHD / 1440p
16−18
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
21−24
low / 720p
130−140
220−230
medium / 1080p
75−80
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Fortnite is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
35−40
85−90
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
QHD / 1440p
16−18
50−55
4K / 2160p
14−16
30−35
low / 720p
75−80
130−140
medium / 1080p
40−45
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Forza Horizon 4 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
110−120
160−170
medium / 768p
95−100
150−160
high / 1080p
45−50
95−100
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−12
24−27
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
95−100
medium / 1080p
20−22
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Metro Exodus is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
75−80
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
10−12
low / 720p
40−45
95−100
medium / 1080p
21−24
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 156% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
80−85
180−190
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
70−75
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
4K / 2160p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
40−45
65−70
high / 768p
55−60
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in World of Tanks is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Radeon R9 Fury
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.2
Code name
GK104
Fiji
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
16 August 2012
16 June 2015
Pipelines
1344
3584
Core clock speed
915 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
224.0
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
7,168 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192-bit GDDR5
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
99 Mh/s
800 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Compute units
56
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price