FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 660M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 660M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce GTX 660M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 660M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 660M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 660M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 10 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 660M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 660M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N13E-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 835 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 30.4 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 660M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 660M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX110
- GeForce GTX 660M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- GeForce GTX 660M vs GeForce MX110