GeForce GTX 660M vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 160% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 15 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |