GeForce GTX 660M vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 660M stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 90 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |