GeForce GTX 660M vs GRID M60 2Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and GRID M60 2Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 660M stacks up against GRID M60 2Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 278 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |