GeForce GTX 660M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660M has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 535 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
190−200
medium / 768p
110−120
160−170
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
80−85
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
3−4
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
85−90
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
50−55
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
65−70
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
24−27
45−50
medium / 768p
16−18
27−30
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N13E-GE
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
1 September 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
835 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.4 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
729.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
36 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
