GeForce GTX 660M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660M has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 635 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 660M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
160−170
medium / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
80−85
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
24−27
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
21−24
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N13E-GE
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
835 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
30.4 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
729.6 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
36 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price