GeForce GTX 660M vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 24% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 210 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 660M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GE | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |