GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 65 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GE | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |