FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 670M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GeForce GTX 670M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 92 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N13E-GS1-LP |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 33.5 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |