FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 670M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against GeForce GTX 670M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 332 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bonaire | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 53 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |