FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 670M
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 670M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 670M.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 27 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 486 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 88% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N13E-GS1-LP |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 33.5 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |