GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 670M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 670M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 820A stacks up against GeForce GTX 670M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 177 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF117 | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |