GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTX 670M
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 670M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 670M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 356 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 502 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |