GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 670M
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 670M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 670M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1789 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 644 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200B | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 336 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |