GeForce GTX 670M vs GRID K260Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 147 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |