GeForce GTX 670M vs GRID K280Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K280Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 147 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |