GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 298 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
190−200
medium / 768p
120−130
160−170
ultra / 1080p
60−65
85−90
QHD / 1440p
35−40
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
85−90
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
65−70
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
95−100
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
30−33
45−50
medium / 768p
18−20
27−30
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
1 September 2017
Pipelines
336
48
Core clock speed
598 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
Memory bus width
192bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price