GeForce GTX 670M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670M has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 125 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 398 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
160−170
medium / 768p
120−130
130−140
ultra / 1080p
60−65
65−70
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
70−75
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
85−90
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
GeForce GTX 670M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
30−33
30−35
medium / 768p
18−20
21−24
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
high / 768p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
336
40
Core clock speed
598 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
192bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
