GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 58% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 108% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |