GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 56 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
9−10
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
120−130
120−130
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
27−30
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
30−33
27−30
medium / 768p
18−20
18−20
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
336
576
Core clock speed
598 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
192bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
