GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro K5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5200 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5200 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 69 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 4508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
60−65
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 229% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
30−33
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K5200
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
GK110B
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
22 July 2014
Pipelines
336
2304
Core clock speed
598 MHz
667 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
148.0
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
3,553 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
192bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
192.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.5
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
