GeForce GTX 670M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 24 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1632 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 24% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 336 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |