GeForce GTX 670M vs Tesla M60
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 41 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 329% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 354% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 312% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 326% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |