FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670MX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670MX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670MX uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 90 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 670MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 26% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N13E-GR |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 48.0 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |