FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670MX.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 330 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 670MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | N13E-GR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R7 260X
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580