GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 670MX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against GeForce GTX 670MX, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670MX uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 696 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 293 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200 | N13E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | 960 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580