GeForce GTX 670MX vs GRID K520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 145 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |