GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro T1000
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 795 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | N13E-GR | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 960 | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Quadro T1000 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- Quadro T1000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro M4000
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T1000 vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti