GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon E8860
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon E8860 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon E8860 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 102% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 3100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GR | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |