GeForce GTX 670MX vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 670MX stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1732 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GR | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X