FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 7400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | N12E-GTX2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |