FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 17400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 280 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | N12E-GTX2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |