GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 14350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 622 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M SLI is 2001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 168% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GT200B | N12E-GTX2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |