GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 675M SLI stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 11150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 125 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 59% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GTX2 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |