GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 280 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 205% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 218% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N12E-GTX2 | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |