FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 675M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 675M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 675M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 330 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Pitcairn | N13E-GS1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 39.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 59 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R9 270
- GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs FirePro M6100
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro M6100
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000