FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 675M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 675M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 675M.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 675M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 130 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
Code name | RV770 | N13E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 39.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |