GeForce GTX 675M vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 230 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 282 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GS1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |