GeForce GTX 675M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 125 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 675M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GS1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |